What are the key considerations when drafting a reverse termination fee provision in an M&A agreement, and how do you advise a client on the appropriate fee amount?
A core M&A Advisory interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.
THE SHORT ANSWER
The reverse termination fee compensates the target if the acquirer fails to close due to financing failure, regulatory denial, or breach. Key considerations: the trigger events (e.g., financing failure, regulatory), the fee amount (typically 3-5% of equity value for cash deals, higher for stock deals), and the exclusivity of remedy (i.e., no specific performance). I advise clients to align the fee with the target's damages (e.g., lost premium, disruption) and the acquirer's risk of non-closing.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓Trigger events: financing, regulatory, breach
- ✓Fee amount: 3-5% of equity value
- ✓Exclusivity of remedy vs specific performance
- ✓Align with target's damages and acquirer's risk
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Setting fee too low to deter walkaway
- ✗Allowing specific performance without cap
Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.
Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- What is §613a BGB and why does it matter in German M&A?
- When is German merger control (Bundeskartellamt) approval needed, and what is the process?
- What is a Sozialplan and when is it required?
- Explain squeeze-out under German law.
- What is the French foreign-investment screening (IEF), and how does it work?
- What happens if works-council consultation is skipped in a German transaction?