Answers / Financial Due Diligence
Explain the concept of 'debt-like items' in Net Debt calculation. Why is a tax liability from a recent acquisition considered debt-like, but a routine tax payable is not?
A core Financial Due Diligence interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.
THE SHORT ANSWER
Debt-like items are obligations that effectively function as debt, typically arising from past transactions or events that will consume cash without generating future economic benefit. A tax liability from an acquisition is debt-like because it's a non-operational, often one-time obligation that would reduce the acquirer's cash. Routine tax payable is operational—part of normal working capital—and is included in NWC. The distinction hinges on whether the item is operational and recurring versus non-operational and one-time.
WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR
- ✓Debt-like: non-operational, consumes cash, no future benefit
- ✓Acquisition tax liability: non-operational, one-time
- ✓Routine tax payable: operational, recurring, part of NWC
COMMON MISTAKES
- ✗Classifying all tax liabilities as debt-like
- ✗Ignoring the nature of the obligation (operational vs non-operational)
Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.
Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.
RELATED QUESTIONS
- Why is the NWC peg important?
- A seller argues that accrued bonuses are part of NWC, not debt-like. How do you respond?
- How do you handle factoring/receivables financing in FDD?
- How would you normalize NWC for a seasonal business?
- How do you handle IFRS 16 lease liabilities in a CFDF deal?
- Explain the concept of 'normalized net working capital' for a seasonal business. How would you calculate the peg in a completion accounts mechanism?