Answers / Corporate Treasury

Explain counterparty risk in derivatives and how it's mitigated.

A core Corporate Treasury interview question — asked in analyst and associate interviews across IB, PE, and the Big 4.

THE SHORT ANSWER

Counterparty (credit) risk on a derivative is the risk the counterparty defaults while the trade is in-the-money to you, so you lose the replacement value (and, mid-settlement, potentially principal). It's bilateral and varies with market moves. Mitigants: an ISDA Master Agreement with close-out netting (so on default all trades net to a single amount, not gross); a CSA requiring daily variation margin/collateral to keep net exposure near zero; counterparty credit limits and diversification across banks; and central clearing of standardized derivatives through a CCP (mandated for many products under EMIR/Dodd-Frank), which novates the trade to the clearing house and largely removes bilateral exposure. You monitor net post-collateral exposure (not gross notional), and CVA prices in the residual default risk. The discipline is measuring true net exposure after netting and collateral, and not concentrating with a single counterparty.

WHAT INTERVIEWERS LISTEN FOR

  • Risk: counterparty defaults while trade is in-the-money (replacement value)
  • ISDA close-out netting + CSA collateral/variation margin
  • Counterparty limits/diversification; central clearing (EMIR) via CCP
  • Monitor net post-collateral exposure; CVA prices residual risk

COMMON MISTAKES

  • Measuring exposure by gross notional
  • Ignoring netting/collateral mitigants
  • Concentrating with one counterparty

Reading isn't the same as answering under pressure.

Interviewers don't hand you the model answer — you deliver yours on a clock. Practice this and 1,000+ questions with AI feedback on every answer.

TRY QUICKFIRE →Or train full Corporate Treasury case simulations →

RELATED QUESTIONS